Justice
curtains naked statues

By
Jennifer Harper
THE
WASHINGTON TIMES

It is a true undercover
operation. The bane of the big and the buxom has come to
an end at the Department of Justice.
The monumental,
bare-breasted Spirit of Justice statue that towers over
the official speaker's dais is now safely behind a set
of no-nonsense blue drapes. After decades of providing
comic relief for wily photographers, she has ruined her
last photo op.
But heavens, it's the old
right-wing, conservative prudes at work, according to
press accounts that cast Attorney General John Ashcroft
in the role of censor in chief.
According to ABC News,
the "strongly religious" Mr. Ashcroft was
"fed up," and could not abide waggish
photographs angled to include his face and the statue's
right breast — a fate that had befallen former
Attorney General Edwin Meese the day he released the
final findings of a pornography commission back in 1986.
"No one in the Great
Hall that day could ever forget the spectacle of the
still photographers writhing on the floor, flat on their
backs, in order to grab the shot of Meese holding up the
porn report," noted ABC at its news Web site
yesterday.
Canny photographers got a
similar shot of Mr. Ashcroft in November, ultimately
turning the Spirit of Justice into statue non grata.
Some interpet this as a
good sign.
"This is a refreshing
change from the prior administration. I am surprised
Bill Clinton didn't take this statue with him to
Chappaqua," said Mark Levin, Mr. Meese's former
chief of staff and now chairman of the Landmark Legal
Foundation.
"In fact, I am
surprised Clinton didn't have a live woman up there
instead of a statue," Mr. Levin added.
Mr. Meese was unavailable
for comment yesterday.
Meanwhile, much has been
made of the $7,900 cost of the new drapes, tailored in
the same royal blue hue found in press briefing
backdrops at the White House and elsewhere.
"We are actually
saving money here. This is more cost-effective,"
said Justice spokeswoman Gina Talamora, who explained
that the drapes are put up or taken down according to
"aesthetics" of events.
"To rent drapes for
one occasion is $2,100, including installation, each
time. We'll save money now that we have our own,"
she added. "Besides, the photographers like the
blue backdrop better."
The drapes were not
purchased because of some thundering edict from on high,
either. Mr. Ashcroft's "advance person" made
the recommendation, Miss Talamora said.
Mr. Levin, meanwhile,
smells media bias.
"Robert Kennedy once
turned a whole huge Justice conference room upstairs
into his own office, back in the day," Mr. Levin
recalled. "There was absolutely no media whining
about the cost of drapes and rugs and furniture."
Meanwhile, this is an
equal opportunity condemnation. "Majesty of
Justice," the loin-clothed male counterpart to the
offending statue, is also behind the new curtains.
Drape discussion raged at
several news Web sites yesterday, both pro and con. Some
lauded the fact that "adults were finally back in
charge" and condemned a "juvenile media."
Others criticized the use of "public monies"
and suggested the statue would be better off wearing an
"I'm with stupid" T-shirt.
The statue herself has
been much esteemed over the years. Cast in aluminum by
noted Art Deco-era sculptor Carl Paul Jennewein,
"Spirit of Justice" is listed in fine arts
guides to Washington.
But wags know no bounds.
Parodies of the situation
are already surfacing. According to one version, Mr.
Ashcroft had unveiled a "fully clothed" statue
of Janet Reno before an audience of "relieved
members of the Clinton administration, as well as
several generations of Ms. Reno's cats." |